Category: Law Essay

In this paper, a discussion of law and ethics is made in regard to the decision by CVS Caremark to phase out the sale of tobacco products. CVS is a national outlet company headquartered in Woonsocket. It is the leading outlet of pharmacy and health care products in the United States. The outlet’s major aim is to enhance access to care, lowering overall healthcare costs and according assistance to patients on their path to better health. The chain store has approximately 7,600 stores and more than 800 minute clinics.

CVS has been storing and selling tobacco products together with other drugs to the public. Civil society organizations and health provider groups have recently raised concerns over the practice. Anti-smoking campaigners have also put pressure on retail stores to abandon the arrangement as it encourages smoking of tobacco products. The income generated by the sales of tobacco products to CVS is estimated at $2 billion annually. The amount is substantially reasonable and would require a thorough examination before making the final decision.

Calculate the price

Calculate the price


There are reported alternative ways for the Pharmacy store to recoup the loss of revenue in case they pull out of the tobacco business. Numerous health care providers, such as hospitals and health care insurance companies, have shown interest to partner with CVS to provide easy access to the provision and prescription of medical care. To gain from the opportunities promised by mainstream medical care providers, CVS has decided to quit the business of tobacco

. Therefore, the company has portrayed itself as committed to the enhancement of betterment in healthcare provision. It is envisaged that decent partnerships with other players would cover any losses occasioned by failure in the tobacco trade.

Various ethical and corporate responsibility issues are involved in the activities or decisions of CVS. In the mission statement, the chain store indicates that one of its primary objectives is to help patients improve health and aid in their path towards better health. The statement points to a very noble cause: to help society improve on their health. The practice of storing and selling health care products, such as drugs, augurs well for the welfare of society. Patients are able to access medication easily for their use. A healthy population promises prosperity.

On the other hand, CVS is said to store and sell the products of tobacco, including cigarettes. The harmful effects of the products of tobacco are disastrous for the health of users. They cause stroke and cancer among other ailments. The suffering caused to patients of such ailments is dire. Funds are required for medication. Patients would not be able to undertake their duties or constructive tasks effectively for the creation of wealth. Addiction to tobacco products has also harmful consequences. It becomes a challenge to quit smoking.

In its mission statement, CVS proclaims access to health care and patient assistance in improving their health. The management of the stores is to be aware of or reasonably foresee the effects of tobacco smoking. It is ironic that CVS engages in activities that promote actions against what the company states as its objective. Ethics would require the stores to be involved in affairs that promote better health care. It is commendable that the company has decided to phase out tobacco products.

There are various stakeholders in the tobacco business. Companies or individuals who plant, process, and manufacture tobacco products are the main stakeholders. Their interest in trade is for commercial purposes. They aim at a profit or return. Stakeholders would pray for a better demand for their products in the market so that they could have a steady income. The decision to phase out tobacco products would adversely impact on the growers and processors of the plant

CVS is another stakeholder. The company was an agent in the chain of production and trade. It is reported that its annual revenue from tobacco products is $2 billion. It is a substantial income in business. The decision will undoubtedly harm CVS. It will lose a similar amount in the near future due to the withdrawal of the service. The loss may be greater than what is reported. The reason is that the users of tobacco products may completely shun the stores.

The clients of tobacco stores are the last set of stakeholders. They have collected their favorite products from CVS. Now, they will be forced to relocate to other shops where the necessary products are sold. The decision has an effect of causing inconvenience to users. They will be required to travel long distances or get used to new providers or sellers. Some may be forced to quit smoking altogether. It is to this group of tobacco consumers that CVS owed the most. In fact, the consumption of tobacco products has harmful effects on the health of users. Thus, the decision to stop the storage and sale of products can only serve to benefit smokers. If they follow suit and quit smoking tobacco products, their health and productivity would i