A systematic risk is described as the collapse of a fully functioning system which may broaden to a market. However, a systematic risk does not occur at an individual level, entity or group within a system. Significantly, some may describe it as a potential catastrophe or instability experienced with a financial system. As such, analysts do claim that a systematic risk is caused by idiosyncratic pre-conditions relative to financial intermediaries. More importantly, systematic risks are normally imposed by interdependence within a system especially an active market. Interdependency may occur when there is a failure within the single entity or entities. Consequently, failures within single entities do occur when there is the conflict of interests within market leaders. Evidently, conflicts of interest do lead to mismanagement misconceptions, which do lead, to high chances of bankruptcy. Furthermore, conflicts of interest do have the potential to collapse an entire market structure. Subsequently, such cascading failures do lead to the popularly known systematic risks.
Market gurus have developed ways to measure systematic risks within a market structure. For example, the American Property Association has developed two key assessment measures of systematic risks. There is TBTF (too large to fail) and TICTF (too interconnected with a chance to fail). TBTF is labeled as a traditional analysis which does assess the government risks during investments to local, national and international organizations (Nottonson, 2007). Furthermore, this assessment does concentrate on various aspects like market concentration, competitive barriers, product substitution, segmentation and pricing. As such, there are large organizations present in a market and financial segments spread among the numerous insurance companies. The TICTF is a more useful systematic measurement of a risk, as opposed to the traditional TBTF. In the recent times, most of the financial and federal relief decisions have been made using this analyses. The TICTF is a measure of certain likelihood relative to the set goals. The established goals do have a negative impact on a larger economy based on an organization’s activities and products.